News & insights
Perspectives on Iraqi connectivity
Analysis of the infrastructure questions we work on — written for network operators, institutional buyers and international partners assessing the Iraqi market.
Showing 4
- Infrastructure[Publication date required]
Why local peering matters for Iraq
When two Iraqi networks exchange traffic through infrastructure outside the country, the cost is paid three times: in latency, in transit spend, and in dependence. Local exchange changes the default.
- Peering
- IXP
- Latency
- Resilience
- Transit
- Public sector[Publication date required]
What government connectivity programmes actually require
Public-sector connectivity is judged in the third year, not at the launch event. That single fact should shape every technical and commercial decision in the programme.
- Government
- Continuity
- Intranet
- Delivery
- Governance
- Network design[Publication date required]
Terrestrial and satellite connectivity are complements, not rivals
The useful question is not which technology wins. It is which layer carries which obligation — and what happens to the site when the primary path fails.
- Satellite
- Fibre
- Resilience
- Remote sites
- Design
- Market entry[Publication date required]
Entering the Iraqi market: what international vendors should ask a local partner
The questions that separate a partner who can deliver from one who can only introduce. Written from the perspective of the party being assessed.
- Partnerships
- Compliance
- Due diligence
- Market entry
- Channel
Company news will be published here
This section currently contains perspective articles only. Corporate announcements, project news and press releases will be added as they are approved for publication.
Discuss any of this in more detail
If a question here is relevant to a programme you are planning, we are glad to go deeper — including on the parts where the honest answer is that it depends.